Question:
how can big crunch occure?
Shiva
2011-01-07 02:16:18 UTC
it is belived that the universe had started in the big bang and will end in big crunch.
the force emmited at the time of big bangis causing the universe to expand. and it is said that when gravitational force will exceed that force it will start shrinking and end in big crunch..

but gravitational force is due to mass and radius {distance}...
F = GmM / R^2

now if at the time of big bang when radius was too small {after the mass had been created } if gravitational force can not overcome it the force then after this much expantion how can it ? and i believe that mass can nither be created nor be destroyed...
so it must keep on expanding...
Three answers:
thecanadianone
2011-01-11 00:28:24 UTC
I found an excellent explanation of where our knowledge of these matters is at present:



"In cosmology, the Big Crunch is a hypothesis that states the universe will stop expanding and start to collapse upon itself; a counterpart to the Big Bang.



Gravitational_lensing.png

Lensing due to gravity



If the gravitational attraction of all the matter in the observable horizon is high enough, then it could stop the expansion of the universe, and then reverse it. The universe would then contract, in about the same time as the expansion took. Eventually, all matter and energy would be compressed back into a gravitational singularity. It is meaningless to ask what would happen after this, as time would stop in this singularity as well.



For this to happen, the average density of matter in the Universe has to be so high that the overall spatial curvature of the Universe is positive, like the surface of a sphere. If the matter density is less than a certain value, called the critical density, the curvature is negative (like a hyperbolic surface, which is a mathematical manifold often compared to the form of a saddle) and gravitation will be too feeble to completely counter inertia, so that expansion will continue to slow down but never come to an end. These two cases, and the limiting case in between in which space is flat, are called the 3 Friedmann models. They assume the cosmological constant to be zero.



However, recent experimental evidence (namely the observation of distant supernovae as standard candles, and the well-resolved mapping of the cosmic microwave background) have - to most scientists' considerable surprise - shown that the expansion of the universe is not being slowed down by gravity, but instead, accelerating, suggesting that the universe will not end with a "Big Crunch", but will instead expand forever. (The evidence of an accelerating universe is considered conclusive by most cosmologists since 2002.)



In the framework of the field equations of the General Theory of Relativity, the simplest model of an accelerating expansion corresponds to a positive value of the cosmological constant, which is often attributed to the quantum vacuum itself exerting a negative pressure that repels gravitationally on large scales. More generally, the accelerating expansion is attributed to dark energy, which could be the cosmological constant, or a dynamical field with negative pressure, leading to an effective cosmological constant that could be time-varying. In such cases, it is theoretically possible that the cosmological constant need not remain positive, leaving open the possibility of a Big Crunch in a cosmic doomsday scenario. A Big Crunch is also still theoretically possible if Einstein's theory of general relativity turns out to be incorrect on large scales. The current evidence neither favors nor rules out dark energy, or modifications of general relativity, of a form that could halt or reverse an eternal expansion; it does, however set lower bounds on the soonest the universe could collapse (~ 42 billion years from now, or more than 24 billion years at the 95% confidence level, according to one group led by Andrei Linde).



The Big Crunch is also referred to as the Gnab Gib ("Big Bang" read backwards). "
2016-11-08 13:00:36 UTC
"finally ending as a black hollow singularity." that isn't the reported results of the vast Crunch, as any 'crunched' singularisation of spacetime itself does no longer enable a black hollow to exist. There could be no area wherein to have a Schwarzchild radius. As yet, the vast Crunch thought is in simple terms a hypothesis, and lacks any information to validate it. we don't comprehend the extreme density of the universe, subsequently we don't comprehend if that is above or decrease than the edge for this to take place. the present indications are that growth will proceed, yet that isn't definitive.
Blain Rinehart
2011-01-07 02:33:14 UTC
Well, the initial expansion might have been fueled by the big bang, but the commonly accepted idea is that current expansion is caused by dark matter/energy. I think of it like this: spacetime (the stuff that matter affects, and which also affects matter) is constantly expanding as an intrinsic property, and the presence of matter 'consumes' spacetime.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...